The following William & Mary Summer REU announcement can also be found here.
UNDERGRADUATE MATHEMATICS RESEARCH FELLOWSHIPS
FOR SUMMER 2009
IN MATRIX ANALYSIS AND ITS APPLICATIONS
AT WILLIAM & MARY
I. PROGRAM SUMMARY
The Mathematics Department of the College of William and
Mary will run an NSF-funded REU program on "Matrix Analysis and its
Applications ," in the summer of 2009. This represents more than 20 years
of REU at William and Mary, and the program will be run by Professor Charles R.
Johnson who has been a fixture throughout its history.
Matrix analysis is a more advanced version of linear
algebra. It is deeply related to all parts of mathematics and most areas to
which mathematics is applied. See the Cambridge University Press text/
monograph "Matrix Analysis" by R. Horn and Johnson or look at
JohnsonÕs list of more than 300 publications on MathSciNet to get a feel for
the subject.
The 2009 program will begin at 9:00 am June 8 (with the 7th
as arrival day) and run throughout July 31 (with August 1 as departure date).
Eight students will be competitively selected to participate
in the program. NSF requires that funded participants be US citizens or
permanent residents who have begun undergraduate study prior to the program and
have not yet graduated by the September following. Each eligible participant
will receive $2,900 toward pay and expenses, and free housing in one of the
CollegeÕs residence halls. In addition, in case of extraordinary merit, foreign
or younger participants will be considered and, if admitted, given free
on-campus housing in the same dormitory.
The first week of the program will contain a series of
background seminars to establish a common language for the entire program and
to introduce students to eight or ten open and accessible research problem
areas. Early the first week, each student will select a topic among the many
presented. Students may work in small teams, or in a 1-1 fashion, with their
research mentors.
To help students explore some of their research problems,
they will be introduced to mathematical software such as MAPLE, MATLAB, and
LATEX that are available to REU students on the department's Linux workstations
and Windows labs.
Over the last 20 years, matrix analysis has proved to be an
ideal theme for undergraduate research at William and Mary because it
1.
offers a wide range of attractive projects at many levels of complexity,
2. has
research problems that can be explored by undergraduates, and
3. has
linkages with other mathematical disciplines, e.g., graph theory,
combinatorics, operator theory, statistics, geometry, and mathematical biology.
Previous summer's programs have led to student presentations
at national conferences, and more than 50% of student participants have
co-authored papers that have appeared in refereed professional journals such as
"Linear Algebra and its Applications," and "Linear and
Multilinear Algebra." A list of some topics studied by students between
1998 and 2008 is given later. To insure currency, the topics to be offered in
summer 2009 will be chosen shortly before the program begins. They will offer
wide variety, depth and novelty.
II. HOW AND WHEN TO APPLY
There will be no special application form for our REU
program. Instead, to apply for the summer 2009 program, please prepare a letter
listing the following information:
1. Full name, college address
and phone, and home address and phone;
2. e-mail address;
3. Social security number and
birth date;
4. Citizenship (Are you a
citizen or permanent resident of the United States or one of its possessions?);
5. Current college or
university, current undergraduate status (freshman, sophomore,...), academic
major, and expected date of graduation;
6. Minority status (optional):
Woman, Native American, African-American, Hispanic, Pacific Islander;
7. A list of college
mathematics courses completed, including textbook titles and authors, and the
grades received;
8. A list of mathematics
courses that will be completed before the summer of 2009, including textbook
titles;
9. Names and titles of two
people who will be sending letters of recommendation on your behalf. (Choose
mathematics instructors who are well-qualified to comment on your mathematical
ability and experience.);
10. A personal statement about your
own interest in mathematics and your own goals for the REU program.
Please arrange for all of the above materials to be sent to
Ms Marianna Williamson
Mathematics Department REU Program
College of William and Mary
P.O. Box 8795
Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795.
E-mail letters and applications are welcome; they should be
sent to Ms Williamson at mkwill@wm.edu.
Applications and supporting letters should arrive no later
than March 4, 2009. Review of applications and possible offers may begin
earlier.
If you have questions or need more information, please
contact the Program Assistant, Shahla Nasserasr, by mail, telephone
(757-221-4627), or e-mail (naserasr@math.wm.edu).
III. THEME AND GOALS OF OUR PROGRAM
The William and Mary REU program's objective is to provide
talented undergraduates with the experience of how research in mathematics is
done, something that is quite different from the way in which undergraduate
mathematics is usually taught and learned.
Close contact between REU students and program faculty is
the key to our past successes. Our plan is that the relationship between REU
students and faculty mentors should be a smaller-scale version of the
relationship between Ph.D. students and their thesis advisors. Our experience
has shown the importance of daily faculty guidance in undergraduate research.
In addition to the interaction of students with their
advisors about their research problems, a number of other activities are
planned to expand the undergraduates' appreciation of mathematics, its beauty,
and its elegance and interconnections. Periodic lectures will bring the participants
in contact with a number of visiting researchers and enable students to witness
the excitement of research at close hand. We also anticipate having speakers
from other departments at William and Mary and from nearby academic
institutions and government facilities who will report on recent progress in a
variety of modern areas that use matrix analysis in an important way:
cryptosystems, linear control, computational geometry, robotics, mathematical
biology, scientific computation, econometrics, and ecological models are a few
examples of possible topics. In addition, part of one day will be devoted to
discussion of the graduate application and admissions process. In the past a
graduate admissions officer from a major mathematics department has been a guest
for this discussion.
IV. A SAMPLER OF PROBLEMS
What follows is an overview of several broad mathematical
themes that have run through previous years' REU programs. We suspect that
faculty members will propose related problems for the 2009 REU program, and
probably many others as well, and that next summer's REU students will build
upon the discoveries of REU students in previous summers. However we will not
make final decisions about next summer's problems until shortly before the
program begins.
1. Sign
pattern matrix equations
A "sign pattern" is a
matrix each of whose entries is +, -, or 0. Associated with an m-by-n sign
pattern A is the set Q(A) of all matrices whose signs conform to the pattern A.
We say that sign pattern A requires (allows) matrix property P if H has property
P whenever H is in Q(A) (respectively, if there is a H in Q(A) with property
P). "Qualitative matrix theory", with roots in economics, biology,
chemistry, and computer science, seeks to characterize those sign patterns that
require or allow a given property.
We say that the triple of sign
patterns A (m-by-p), B (p-by-n) and C (m-by-n) is globally consistent if there
exist H in Q(A), J in Q(B), and K in Q(C) such that HJ=K.
A fundamental and large-scale
question is: Which triples of sign patterns are globally consistent? Many
problems are special cases and there are many interesting variants; results on
any portion of the large-scale problem would be of interest. An obvious
necessary condition is the following. Say that A, B and C, as above, are
locally consistent if for each pair i,j with i < m+1 and j < n+1, the
i-th row of A, the j-th column of B and the i,j entry of C are globally
consistent. (It is quite easy to determine this.) Since local consistency is
obviously necessary for global consistency, a good way to view the large
problem is the following: which locally consistent triples are not globally
consistent? To see that this is an interesting question, you may wish to verify
that the triple
A = | + - |
B = | + + |
C = | + - |
| - + |, | + + |, | +
- |,
is locally, but not globally,
consistent. In fact, for m=n=p=2, this is the only such example up to obvious
symmetries.
2. Determinental
probabilities associated with sign patterns
Definitions and notation remain as
above. It is well understood for which sign patterns A it is true that "B
in Q(A) implies det(B)=0." It is also known for which sign patterns A it
is true that "B in Q(A) implies det(B) is not 0" (though the computational
complexity of deciding this question is open). In the latter case, the sign of
det(B) (+ or -) is determined by A. In all other cases, some matrices in Q(A)
will have positive determinant and some negative. The following question has
recently arisen: How may one compute the probability that det(B) will be
positive for B in Q(A)? To make this precise, assume that positive (resp.
negative) entries are chosen uniformly and independently from (0,1] (resp.
[-1,0)). Several particular questions may be raised about the relation between
this probability and A. This problem fits into the general area of qualitative
matrix theory, an active area of research, and there are many more open
questions about the relation between sign patterns and matrix properties.
3. Linear
preserver problems
Linear preserver problems are an
active research area in matrix theory. These problems concern the structure of
linear transformations on matrix spaces that preserve some special properties.
For example, it is easy to check that if M and N are square matrices such that
det(MN) = 1, then the transformation defined by T(A) = MAN satisfies "det(T(A))
= det(A) for all A." The transformation defined by T(A) = MA'N (where A'
denotes the transpose of A) also satisfies "det(T(A)) = det(A) for all
A." It is somewhat surprising that the converse of this statement is also
true, namely, if T is a linear transformation on square matrices such that
det(T(A)) = det(A) for all A, then T must be one of the two forms described
above. One may study transformations preserving other properties such as rank,
invertibility, etc. and obtain similar results.
4. Isometry
problems
Let V be a normed vector space,
i.e., a vector space equipped with a norm (length) function. For example, the
Euclidean norm for R^n (defined by ||x|| = (x'x)^{1/2}) is one possible
example. Starting with a given norm, it is of interest to characterize those
linear transformations T from V to V such that ||T(v)|| = ||v|| for all v in V.
Such a T is called an isometry for ||.||. For example, T is an isometry for the
Euclidean norm on R^n if and only if T is orthogonal, i.e., T'T = I. But there
are also other important norms on V and it is interesting to study isometries
of V with such norms.
5. Determinants
of special matrices
While the study of determinants has
a long history, there are still many interesting unsolved problems. Here are
two examples.
a) For fixed values of n > k >
1, consider the class of all n by n matrices satisfying:
i)
every entry in the matrix is either 0 or 1, and
ii)
the sum of every row is k, and
iii)
the sum of every column is k.
What are the possible determinant
values for such matrices? What is the largest possible determinant value of
such a matrix? Bounds are known, and complete solutions are known for special
values of $n$ and $k$, but the general case is open.
b) Consider a real symmetric matrix
A with singular values a_1, ..., a_n, and a real skew-symmetric matrix B with
singular values b_1,..., b_n. What are the possible determinant values of A+B?
(The singular values of X are the nonnegative square roots of the eigenvalues
of X'X.)
6. Numerical
ranges of matrices
Given a complex matrix A, the
numerical range of A is the set W(A) = { x*Ax: x in C^n, x*x = 1}. Clearly, A
determines W(A), but the geometry of W(A) is not yet understood. It is known
that W(A) is a convex set that contains all of the eigenvalues of A, but W(A)
is usually much bigger than the convex hull of those eigenvalues. For example,
if A is a 2 by 2 matrix, then W(A) is an ellipse with the eigenvalues of A as
foci, and the geometric shape of W(A) for a 3 by 3 matrix has also been
described. An open problem is to describe the possible geometric shapes of W(A)
for matrices of higher dimension, at least in some particular cases.
What does the set W(A) tell us about
A? Suppose we do not have full information about A, but only have W(A). It
turns out that we can still get important information about A. For example,
W(A) = {z} if and only if A = zI, and W(A) is a subset of real line if and only
if A is hermitian. An interesting problem is to determine the relationships
between properties of the subset W(A) of C^n and properties of A.
7. Matrix
semipositivity and generalizations
We say that an m-by-n matrix B is
semipositive provided there is an entry-wise nonnegative n-vector x (i.e.,
every entry of x is greater than or equal to zero) such that the m-vector Bx is
entry-wise positive. Such matrices arise in the study of convergence of matrix
sets and we know that a certain subclass of the semipositive matrices, namely
the class of minimally semipositive matrices, is particularly important. A
matrix B is minimally semipositive provided B is semipositive and no matrix
obtained from B by deleting one or more columns is semipositive. It turns out
that when B is square, B is minimally semipositive if and only if B is
invertible and its inverse has only nonnegative entries. This generalizes to a
slightly more complicated statement in the case that B is not square.
Although the class of minimally
semipositive matrices has been studied extensively, many questions remain that
form appropriate REU projects. Some examples are:
a) Completion problems: Given a
"partial matrix", in which some entries are specified and others
remain to be determined, under what circumstances can the unspecified entries
be chosen so that the resulting matrix is semipositive? or minimally
semipositive? The answer is fairly easy for the semipositive case, but is not
known for minimally semipositive matrices.
b) Detecting semipositivity: Known
results suggest an algorithm for determining whether or not a given matrix is
semipositive, but the algorithm has not yet been investigated carefully.
c) Generalizations: A number of
generalizations of semipositivity can be suggested. The nonnegative vectors in
R^n form a "cone" in R^n whose "interior" is the set of
positive vectors. We might replace R^n and R^m with arbitrary vector spaces,
replace the nonnegative and positive vectors with arbitrary "cones"
and their "interiors", and see what results on semipositivity and
minimal semipositivity can be carried over to this more general setting. For
example, is there a condition for minimal semipositivity analogous to the
inverse nonnegativity mentioned above?
V. REU student topics 1998 to 2008
During the summers between 1998 and 2008, REU students in
the Matrix Analysis and Applications program wrote reports on the following
topics. Some of these reports are now being revised for submission to journals.
Our REU program took a sabatical in the summer of 2001 -- consequently there
are no entries for last year.
1. Totally
positive pattern completions
2. Nonzero
patterns in orthogonal matrices
3. Almost
positive semidefinite matrices.
4. Semipositive
and minimally semipositive completions
5. The
Hadamard core for totally non-negative matrices
6. Ratios
of principal minors of totally non-negative matrices
7. Completely
positive matrices and their graphs
8. Eigenvalues
of words in two positive definite letters
9. Critical
points of the SSTRESS criterion in metric multidimensional scaling
10. Coxeter
graphs, groups, and Weyl chambers
11. Statistical
analysis of the determinants of certain sign pattern matrices
12. A
generalization of the classical numerical range
13. Eigenvalues
and boundary curvature of the numerical range
14. Reflections
on Coxeter groups
15. Symmetric
sign patterns allowing symmetric and skew-symmetric matrices with given row and
column sums
16. Spectral
ranges of sign patterns
17. On the
diagonal scaling of squared distance matrices to doubly stochastic matrices
18. The list
of eigenvalue multiplicities for an Hermitian matrix whose graph is a tree
19. Numerical
ranges of tridiagonal matrices
20. Central
groupoids, central digraphs, and zero-one matrices satisfying $A^2 = J$.
21. Absolutely
flat idempotent matrices
22. Positive
definite extension problems for structured matrices
23. Divisor
tournament matrices
24. Ray
non-singularity of matrices
25. Relations
between matrix theory and function theory
26. Commutativity of matrix patterns
27. Determinental
inequalities in matrix classes