Math 150: The History of Chance
Michael W. Trosset
The following information is for Fall 2003:
General Description
Gambling is an ancient human activity; efforts to understand
this activity led European philosophers to modern notions of chance and
risk. This seminar will explore the historical development of
probabilistic and statistical modes of thought. The first half of the
course will emphasize developments in the 15th, 16th, and 17th centuries,
focussing especially on the celebrated correspondence between Blaise
Pascal and Pierre de Fermat. In the second half, each student will
explore a related topic of interest.
Basic Information
Math 150 will meet on Tuesdays and Thursdays,
from 11:00 a.m. to 12:20 p.m., in Room 4 of Morton Hall.
Tentative Office Hours
Tuesdays, 3:30-5:00 p.m., Wednesdays, TBA, or by appointment,
in Jones 127.
Attendance is Required
This is a seminar. Most classes will be dedicated to discussing the
readings. It is absolutely essential that you read all assigned material
and come to class prepared to discuss it.
Texts
There are three primary texts: P.L. Bernstein's Against the Gods: The
Remarkable Story of Risk, F.N. David's Games, Gods and Gambling: A
History of Probability and Statistical Ideas and I. Hacking's The
Emergence of Probability.
Reading Assignments
- Chapters 1-2 in Bernstein, Chapters 1-3 in David
- Chapters 1-5 in Hacking
- Chapter 3 in Bernstein, Chapters 4-7 and Appendix 2 in David, Chapter
6 in Hacking
- Chapter 4 in Bernstein, Chapter 8 in David, Chapter 7 in Hacking
- Chapter 9 and Appendix 4 in David
- Chapters 8-10 in Hacking, plus handout
- Chapter 11 in David, Chapter 11 in Hacking
- Chapter 5 in Bernstein, Chapter 10 in David, Chapters 12-13 in Hacking
- Chapter 12 in David, Chapters 14-15 in Hacking
- Chapters 6-7 in Bernstein, Chapter 13 in David, Chapters 16-17 in
Hacking
Writing Assignments
This course fulfills the College's writing requirement.
Each student will write three response papers and one term paper.
Response Papers (approx 2 pages each)
- I will provide a circumscribed assignment, e.g., "Discuss the use of
Pascal's Wager in Eric Rohmer's Ma Nuit Chez Maud."
- Each student will have one week to produce (a) a draft of the
response paper, and (b) a commentary that explains the draft. The
commentary will consist of short (typically one-sentence) statements that
describe the paper's primary thesis and the role of each paragraph in
supporting that thesis.
- The students will peer-review each other's drafts. Each student will
receive one other student's draft plus commentary. I will provide a
checklist of review criteria. Each student will have 5-7 days to write a
brief reaction paper (approx 1 page) that offers constructive suggestions
on how to improve the draft.
- Each student will have one week to produce the final paper.
Term Paper (approx 10 pages)
- Each student will submit a brief written proposal (approx 1 page) for
a term paper. I will reserve class time for discussion of the proposals.
- After a proposal is approved and research has commenced, the student
will submit an annotated bibliography (approx 2 pages) of materials on
which the term paper is likely to draw. I plan to devote one class
meeting to exploring library resources
relevant to historical research in mathematics. This meeting will take
place at the SWEM library. I hope to work with one of the research
librarians in introducing the students to the resources that they are
likely to use in researching their term paper.
- Each student will submit a draft of the term paper.
- The students will peer-review each other's drafts. Each student will
write a brief reaction paper (approx 2 pages) that offers constructive
suggestions on how to improve the draft.
- Each student will submit a final paper.
Grades
Your semester grade will be based on the grades that you receive on your
writing assignments (70%) and on your contributions to class discussion
(30%). Grades on writing assignments will be weighted in proportion to
the approximate numbers of pages indicated above.
Response Papers
- Discuss the speech by Cicero's fictional character Quintus,
reproduced on page 24 of David. In essence, Quintus is arguing that:
If an alleged coincidence seems too implausible, then we tend to
believe that it wasn't really a coincidence. Provide a modern example
of this type of reasoning. Propose a way to use a fair die to determine
if a self-proclaimed psychic has extrasensory perception.
- Compare Galileo's essay, Sopra le Scoperte dei Dadi, and the
letters between Pascal and Fermat with respect to the probability concepts
implicit and explicit in each. The letters are often cited as the birth of
modern probability. Do you agree? Argue one of the following
perspectives: either (1) compared to Galileo's essay, the Pascal-Fermat
letters contain important conceptual advances in the study of probability;
or (2) the Pascal-Fermat letters merely elaborate on probability concepts
previously articulated by Galileo. Neither perspective is
"correct"---Hacking writes that "not until the correspondence between
Fermat and Pascal do we find expectation well understood," whereas David
contends that the Pascal-Fermat contribution "was in effect the extension
of the idea of the exhaustive enumeration of the fundamental probability
set, which had already been given by Galileo." Support your
argument with quotations from Galileo and Pascal-Fermat.
Reaction Papers
Here are some things to consider when critiquing a paper.
The purpose of your critique is to provide
constructive criticism that will help the author write a
better second draft. Be fair. If you discover something that you like,
don't hesitate to compliment it. If you discover something that could be
improved, don't hesitate to note it. And be nice! No matter what you
think privately, find a way to
communicate your thoughts in a neutral, objective style that respects
the author's feelings. I trust you to write critiques with
maturity; I will not tolerate use of this forum to insult other students.
Global Issues
- Is the thesis clearly stated?
- Does the argument support the thesis?
- Is the thesis/argument responsive to the assignment?
- Is the argument sound and adequately documented?
- Does the paragraph structure support the logical development of the
argument?
- Does the mathematics support the argument?
- Is more or less mathematics needed to support the argument?
- Is the conclusion persuasive?
Local Issues
- Is the mathematics correct?
- Would more or less mathematical detail be desirable?
- How well is each paragraph constructed?
- Are the sentences well-formed and grammatically correct?
- Are the words well-chosen and correctly spelled?